- CIA Memo Could Have Major Impact on Tyree Case - Bush, Shackley Exposed
Federal Prosecutors Knowingly Used Perjured CIA Affidavit to Secure '82 Convictions of CIA Agent Edwin Wilson
Cream of the Current U.S. Legal/Judicial System Guilty of Perjury, Subornation and Conspiracy according to CIA and Justice Department Memos
No less than seven of the most powerful and prominent names in the U.S. legal/judicial system stand exposed of perjury and subornation of perjury according to CIA and Department of Justice documents in the possession of former CIA agent Edwin Wilson and his Houston attorney. The documents also indicate that Department of Justice officials knowingly concealed exculpatory evidence from Wilson's defense team before his 1982 conviction and 1983 sentencing on weapons charges. These documents have led to the filing of a motion by Wilson's court appointed attorney, David Adler, seeking to vacate Wilson's conviction on charges of selling plastic explosives to Libya in the period from 1976 to 1978. The Government is scheduled to respond to the motion in mid-January and may well have a tough time doing so in away that avoids deep embarrassment, professional sanctions and/or criminal exposure for a lot of very important people.
Wilson, 71, serving a total of 52 years on three separate convictions was, according to Adler, convicted on the basis of a perjured affidavit from the CIA to the Department of Justice denying that Wilson had any "direct or indirect" affiliation or association with the Agency during the period of time in which he was selling plastic explosives to Libya's Moammar Qaddaffi and other groups. That the affidavit was perjured was confirmed by the release, under the Freedom of Information Act of an uncontested CIA follow-up memorandum addressed to then Deputy Assistant Attorney General Mark Richard entitled, "Duty To Disclose False Testimony."
That document, buttressed by additional papers, located over the last two and half years by Adler, indicates clearly that the Central Intelligence Agency committed perjury when it provided an affidavit from the Agency's then number three man, Executive Director Charles Briggs, to prosecutors trying Wilson's case. That affidavit, according to Adler, emphatically asserted that, "After a particular date in 1971 'Wilson was not asked or requested, directly or indirectly, to perform or provide any services, directly or indirectly for the CIA.'"
Adler's additional research, after traveling repeatedly from Houston to Washington to review close to 300,000 pages of documents, some released under the Freedom of Information Act, uncovered additional memoranda from the Department of Justice (DoJ). These documents indicate clearly that DoJ prosecutors and their supervisors, understood that the CIA memorandum was perjured and then decided to use it anyway.
"There is a handwritten notation," Adler told FTW, "at the top of the [Duty to Disclose] memorandum stating, 'Plain meaning of affidavit,' then there is an arrow off to the side where the writing continues, "the affidavit is inaccurate."
Adler, a retired CIA officer, now an attorney in private practice in Houston, was appointed to represent Wilson by U.S. District Court Judge Lynn Hughes in mid 1997 after Hughes received a copy of the memorandum directly from Wilson. Adler began a search through the FOIA documents stored in the warehouse of attorney Bernard Fensterwald who had been assisting Wilson with his FOIA appeals over a period of years. That cumbersome process, which involved repeated trips between Houston and Washington, turned up additional Justice Department records which, said Adler, "In my opinion, indicate that the prosecutors were aware that the affidavit was false."
One of those documents, a classified memorandum which has subsequently been summarized for public release, is particularly incriminating.
"What that document says," said Adler, "is that right before that document [the perjured CIA affidavit] was put into evidence at Wilson's trial, the CIA's lawyers spoke to the prosecutors from Justice and told them, 'Don't use the affidavit.' The prosecutors in the case said, 'We're going to use it.' [CIA General Counsel Stanley] Sporkin himself said, 'At least take out the word indirectly as far as indirectly provided services,' and the prosecutor [Greenberg] probably said something like, 'Hell No. We're gonna just go ahead and do it.'
"In my opinion the document was used in court even though the DoJ lawyers knew full well that it was a lie."
What makes the case so compelling is the fact that the last piece of evidence the jury asked to be reread to them was the perjured affidavit denying that Wilson had any continuing connections to the Agency. Within minutes of hearing the affidavit reread by the trial judge, the jury emerged with a guilty verdict.
These motions, documents and exhibits, totaling four volumes and more than 900 pages [which FTW is in the process of obtaining for a complete review] indicate that some of the then most influential and powerful lawyers in the country, who have since become even more powerful Judges, attorneys and government officials, knowingly suborned perjury by the CIA and violated one of the keystone principles of Constitutional law. That principle states that whenever a prosecutor becomes aware of exculpatory evidence it must be immediately disclosed to the defense. Failure to do so is grounds for an immediate dismissal of the case. Such actions also deprive defendants of Due Process rights under the Constitution. These offenses are also grounds for disbarment or, in the case of federal Judges, impeachment and removal from office. This is particularly significant since threeindividuals involved in the Wilson case now sit on the Federal Bench and one is a Justice on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
And, since Wilson's questionable operations trace directly back to 1976 when Wilson, Shackley, Albert Hakim, Tom Clines and Richard Secord became involved together, they indicate that retired CIA Associate Deputy Director of Operations (ADDO) Ted Shackley and then CIA Director George Bush are likely guilty of perjury or providing false information to investigators. Since both denied any Agency connection to Wilson they are certainly guilty of obstruction of justice. They both denied repeatedly, and emphatically, to criminal and Congressional investigators in the late seventies and early eighties that Wilson was acting in any official role for the CIA after 1971.
The Magnificent Seven
According to Adler, there were seven legal powerhouses involved with the case and they all knew of the perjured CIA memorandum and its use to secure Wilson's conviction. Although FTW is continuing to investigate their exact roles in the case, it is apparent, based upon interviews with Adler, that all knew that a perjured document had been introduced into evidence and that some of them argued for the act and some argued against it. One thing is certain, not one of them came forward and said ANYTHING about the act after Wilson was convicted. Under all states' canon of legal ethics that omission to report the crime is, in itself, is a serious violation. The seven key figures are:
Regular FTW readers who have been following the case of former U.S. Army Special Forces Trooper William Tyree will recall that affidavits and other documents already filed in other court cases indicate that, in the mid seventies, Edwin Wilson orchestrated a series of missions known as Watchtower. Those documents, including the so-called "Cutolo Affidavit" specifically name Wilson as having directed operations in which Special Forces troops placed radio beacons inside Colombia so that CIA cocaine flights could land undetected in Panama.
Reliable CIA sources have told FTW that many of the weapons shipped by Wilson overseas to Libya and other destinations in Central America were the product, in some cases, of burglaries committed at National Guard armories by members of U.S. Army Special Forces. In the 1977-9 time period, Tyree was a member of the 10th Special Forces Group at Fort Devens, Massachusetts and connected to a series of thefts of military hardware.
In January, 1979, as Wilson's operations were being investigated, Tyree's wife Elaine, also in the Army, was murdered. Tyree, who was framed for the murder, has been serving a life sentence since. He has also filed a number of legal actions in recent years, one of which [see related story this issue] connects back to the Wilson case. Critics of Tyree's case have long contended that Wilson was a rogue operative and that Tyree's claims of government involvement in the Watchtower missions were unfounded. The documents filed by Wilson and his attorney now make the government's position unsustainable across the board as far as Wilson's convictions are concerned and they may well crack open the door to freedom for Bill Tyree.
FROM THE WILDERNESS will be paying extremely close attention to this case and will have a detailed analysis of the Court filings in the January, 2000 edition.