-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, UnJ2mTQHvIlfVXpOuMD3e6kEvthZdiGI9vN+oVdpe9TRb7SF2cekCJJ/Wjsqtcfv tVTXnwurXQpsVKfGUzOLiQ== 0000890566-99-000446.txt : 19990412 0000890566-99-000446.hdr.sgml : 19990412 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000890566-99-000446 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 8 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19981231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990331 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 19990408 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CORNELL CORRECTIONS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001016152 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: 8744 IRS NUMBER: 760433642 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-14472 FILM NUMBER: 99584486 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1700 WEST LOOP SOUTH STREET 2: STE 1500 CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TX ZIP: 77027 BUSINESS PHONE: 7136230790 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4801 WOODWAY STREET 2: STE 400W CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TX ZIP: 77056 10-K 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-14472 CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) DELAWARE 76-0433642 (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION (I.R.S. EMPLOYER OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.) 1700 WEST LOOP SOUTH, SUITE 1500, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027 - - ------------------------------------------------ --------------- (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE) REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (713) 623-0790 SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: NONE SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: Common Stock, $.001 par value per share (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ( X ) No ( ) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will be not contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ( ). At February 26, 1999, Registrant had outstanding 9,552,216 shares of its common stock. The aggregate market value of the Registrant's voting stock held by non-affiliates at this date was approximately $148,951,000 based on the closing price of $16.50 per share as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. For purposes of the foregoing calculation, all directors and officers of the Registrant have been deemed to be affiliates, but the Registrant disclaims that any of such directors or officers is an affiliate. Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement for 1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Part III
PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS Cornell Corrections, Inc. (the "Company") is one of the leading providers of privatized correctional, detention and pre-release services in the United States based on total offender capacity. The Company is the successor to entities that began developing secure institutional correctional and detention facilities in 1984, pre-release facilities in 1977 and juvenile facilities in 1973. The Company has significantly expanded its operations through acquisitions and internal growth and is currently operating facilities in 12 states and the District of Columbia. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had contracts to operate 53 facilities with a total offender capacity of 10,525. The Company's residential facilities have a total offender capacity of 9,135 beds, with 51 facilities currently in operation and an existing facility under expansion in Georgia (1,075 beds). The Company provides integrated facility development, design, construction and operational services to governmental agencies within three operating divisions: (i) secure institutional correctional and detention services; (ii) juvenile treatment, educational and detention services and (iii) pre-release correctional services. Secure institutional correctional and detention services consist primarily of the operation of secure adult incarceration facilities. Juvenile services consist of providing residential treatment and educational programs and non-residential community-based programs to juvenile offenders between the ages of 10 and 17 who have either been adjudicated or suffer from behavioral problems. Pre-release correctional services primarily consist of providing pre-release and halfway house programs for adult offenders who are either on probation or serving the last three to six months of their sentences on parole and preparing for re-entry into society. At the secure institutional correctional and detention facilities, the Company generally provides maximum and medium security incarceration and minimum security residential services, institutional food services, certain transportation services, general education programs (such as high school equivalency and English as a second language programs), health care (including medical, dental and psychiatric services), work and recreational programs and chemical dependency and substance abuse programs. Juvenile services provided by the Company include counseling, wilderness, medical and accredited educational programs tailored to meet the special needs of juveniles. Additional services provided in the Company's pre-release facilities typically include life skills and employment training and job placement assistance. The Company derives substantially all its revenues from operating correctional, detention and pre-release facilities for federal, state and local governmental agencies in the United States. For the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, 20.1%, 31.4% and 39.7%, respectively, of the Company's consolidated revenues were derived from contracts with the Federal Bureau of Prisons. HISTORY OF ACQUISITIONS Since 1994, the Company has completed seven acquisitions. In August 1998, the Company acquired substantially all of the Alaskan assets of Allvest, Inc. ("Allvest"), a privately held company based in Anchorage, Alaska. The Allvest acquisition included the operations of five pre-release facilities with an aggregate capacity of 540 beds in Anchorage, Fairbanks and Bethel, Alaska, the real properties of three of the five facilities and assignments of contracts with the Alaska Department of Corrections ("ADC"). The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $21.3 million. In January 1998, the Company purchased the Great Plains Correctional Facility ("Great Plains"), an existing 812 bed medium security prison located in Hinton, Oklahoma for approximately $43.8 million. The prison was operated pursuant to a one-year contract with nine one-year renewal options between the Oklahoma Department of Corrections and the Hinton Economic Development Authority ("HEDA"); HEDA in turn subcontracted the daily operations of the prison to another operator. The Company assumed complete operation of Great Plains in July 1998. The Company has a 30-year operating contract with four five-year renewals with HEDA. The purchase included an additional 20 adjacent acres of land for potential future expansion of the facility. - 2 - In September 1997, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of The Abraxas Group, Inc. and four related entities (collectively, "Abraxas"), a not-for-profit juvenile operator of seven residential facilities and 11 non-residential community-based programs, serving an aggregate capacity of approximately 1,400 juvenile offenders. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $19.2 million. In January 1997, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Interventions Co. ("Interventions") for an aggregate purchase price of $6.0 million. The acquisition included the operation of the Dallas County Judicial Center, a 300 bed adult residential pre-release facility in Dallas, Texas and the Griffin Juvenile Facility, a 150 bed capacity residential transitional living center for juveniles in San Antonio, Texas. In July 1996, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of MidTex Detentions, Inc. ("MidTex"), the operator of secure institutional facilities in Big Spring, Texas (the "Big Spring Complex"), for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23.2 million. The City of Big Spring has an Intergovernmental Agreement (the "IGA") with the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("FBOP") to house the offenders at the Big Spring Complex. As part of the acquisition, MidTex assigned to the Company its rights under an operating agreement with the City of Big Spring (the "Big Spring Operating Agreement") to manage the Big Spring Complex. The Big Spring Operating Agreement has a base term of 20 years from the closing of the acquisition and three five-year renewal options at the discretion of the Company. The IGA has an indefinite term, although it may be terminated or modified by the FBOP upon 90 days written notice. In May 1996, the Company acquired a 310 bed pre-release facility located in Houston, Texas (the "Reid Center"), for approximately $2.0 million. Included in the acquisition was the real and personal property and the assignment of the Reid Center's contract with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice ("TDCJ"). In March 1994, the Company acquired Eclectic Communications, Inc. ("Eclectic"), the operator of 11 privatized secure institutional and pre-release facilities in California with an aggregate offender capacity of 979 beds. Consideration for the acquisition of Eclectic was $10.0 million. INDUSTRY AND MARKET In the United States, there is a growing trend toward privatization of government services and functions, including correctional and detention services, as governments of all types face continuing pressure to control costs and improve the quality of services. According to the Private Adult Correctional Facility Census dated December 31, 1998 ("1998 Facility Census"), the design capacity of privately managed adult secure institutional correctional and detention facilities in operation or under construction worldwide increased from 10,973 beds at December 31, 1989 to 132,572 beds at December 31, 1998, a compound annual growth rate of 32%. In addition, the design capacity of privately managed adult secure institutional correctional and detention facilities increased 24% in the last year. The United States leads the world in private prison management contracts. The 1998 Facility Census reports that at December 31, 1998, there were private adult secure institutional correctional and detention facilities in operation or under construction in 25 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. According to reports issued by the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (the "BJS"), the number of adult offenders housed in United States federal and state prison facilities and in local jails increased from 744,208 at December 31, 1985 to 1,725,842 at June 30, 1997. Management believes that the increase in the demand for privatized adult secure institutional correctional and detention facilities is also a result, in large part, of the general shortage of beds available in United States adult secure institutional correctional and detention facilities. Industry reports also indicate that adult offenders convicted of violent crimes generally serve only - 3 - one-third of their sentence, with the majority of them being repeat offenders. Accordingly, there is a perceived public demand for, among other things, longer prison sentences, as well as prison terms for juvenile offenders, resulting in even more overcrowding in United States correctional and detention facilities. Finally, numerous courts and other government entities in the United States have mandated that additional services offered to offenders be expanded and living conditions be improved. Many governments do not have the readily available resources to make the changes necessary to meet such mandates. Similar to the adult secure institutional correctional and detention industry, the area of pre-release correctional services has experienced substantial growth. The pre-release area primarily comprises individuals who have been granted parole or sentenced to probation. Probationers (individuals sentenced for an offense without incarceration) and parolees (individuals released prior to the completion of their sentence) are typically placed in pre-release settings. These individuals typically spend three to six months in halfway houses until they are prepared to re-enter society. According to the BJS, the number of parolees increased from 220,438 at December 31, 1980 to 690,159 at December 31, 1994, a compound annual growth rate of 8.5%. During the same period, the number of individuals on probation increased from 1.1 million to approximately 3.0 million, a compound annual growth rate of 7.4%. The probation and parole populations represent approximately 71% of the total number of adults under correctional supervision in the United States. The pre-release correctional services industry is extremely fragmented with several thousand providers across the country, most of which are small and operate in a specified geographic area. The juvenile corrections industry has also expanded rapidly in recent years as the need for services for at-risk and adjudicated youth has risen. According to the Criminal Justice Institute, the population in the juvenile correctional system, both residential and non-residential community-based, has increased from 62,268 youths at January 1, 1988 to 102,582 youths at January 1, 1995, a compound annual growth rate of 7.4%. The juvenile corrections industry is also fragmented with several thousand providers across the country, most of which are small and operate in a specific geographic area. OPERATING DIVISIONS SECURE INSTITUTIONAL CORRECTIONAL AND DETENTION SERVICES. At December 31, 1998, the Company operated seven facilities with a total offender capacity of 5,916 beds that provide secure institutional correctional and detention services for incarcerated adults. These facilities consisted of: (i) the 812 bed Great Plains Correctional Facility, a medium security prison operated for HEDA and the Oklahoma Department of Corrections; (ii) the 1,947 bed Big Spring Complex, a minimum to medium security facility operated primarily for the FBOP; (iii) the 302 bed Wyatt Detention Facility, a medium to maximum security facility operated primarily for the United States Marshal Services (the "USMS") in Central Falls, Rhode Island; (iv) two minimum security facilities in California with a total offender capacity of 558 beds operated for the California Department of Corrections (the "CDC"); (v) the Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility, a 672 bed adult detention facility operated for Santa Fe County and (vi) the 1,625 bed D. Ray James Prison, a minimum to medium security facility operated for the State of Georgia. The Company operates the Big Spring Complex pursuant to the Big Spring Operating Agreement between the Company and the City of Big Spring. The City of Big Spring in turn is a party to the IGA with the FBOP for an indefinite term with respect to the facilities. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (the "INS") and the USMS also use the Big Spring Complex. Offenders include detainees held by the INS, adjudicated offenders held by the INS who will be deported after serving their sentences and adjudicated offenders held for the FBOP. The Big Spring Complex is equipped with an interactive satellite link to INS courtroom facilities and judges which allows for processing of a high volume of INS detainees while -4- reducing the time, effort and expense incurred in transporting offenders to offsite courtrooms. The Company completed a 560 bed expansion at the Big Spring Complex in the fourth quarter of 1998. The Wyatt Detention Facility in Central Falls opened in 1993 and primarily houses federal offenders awaiting adjudication under federal criminal charges. The Leo Chesney Correctional Facility (for females) and the Baker Correctional Facility (for males) are both in California and house offenders sentenced by the State of California, most of whom are non-violent offenders with sentences of up to two years. The Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility is a 672 bed adult detention facility that houses offenders from Santa Fe County and various surrounding counties. Construction of the new 672 bed adult detention facility was completed in July 1998. Prior to construction of the new facility, the Company operated a 240 bed facility which housed 200 adult and 40 juvenile offenders. The 240 bed facility was renovated to house 115 juveniles exclusively. The D. Ray James Prison began operations during the fourth quarter of 1998 and houses offenders from the State of Georgia. The Company is currently operating 550 beds with a 1,075 bed expansion to be completed in the first quarter of 1999. Under its contracts, the Company provides a variety of programs and services at its secure institutional facilities, including secure incarceration services, institutional food services, certain transportation services, general education programs (such as high school equivalency and English as a second language programs), work and recreational programs and chemical dependency and substance abuse programs. JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL AND DETENTION SERVICES. Under the name "Cornell Abraxas," the Company offers programs to meet the multiple needs of troubled juveniles. At December 31, 1998, the Company operated or had contracts to operate 14 residential facilities and 14 non-residential community-based programs serving an aggregate capacity of 2,636 youths. Juvenile correctional and detention services consist primarily of treatment programs for offenders that are designed to lead to rehabilitation while providing public safety and holding offenders accountable for their decisions and behavior. The Company operates primarily within a restorative justice model. The basic philosophy is that merely serving time in an institution does not relieve juvenile offenders of the obligation to repay their victims and that incarceration alone does not compensate for the societal impact of crimes. The use of a balanced approach gives equal emphasis to accountability, competency development and community protection. The 160 bed Salt Lake Valley Juvenile Detention Facility in Salt Lake City, Utah includes an interactive satellite link to juvenile courtroom facilities and judges, which allows for processing of a high number of juvenile detainees while reducing the time, effort and expense incurred in transporting detainees to offsite courtrooms. The Santa Fe County Juvenile Detention Facility in Santa Fe, New Mexico is a contracted 115 bed facility that houses juvenile offenders for Santa Fe County and various surrounding counties. The facility, which was previously a 240 bed facility that housed 200 adults and 40 juveniles, was renovated to house 115 juveniles. The Griffin Juvenile Facility is a 150 bed capacity transitional living center for juveniles located in San Antonio, Texas. The Company currently has contracts for the housing of adjudicated and certain homeless non-adjudicated juveniles. Generally, Cornell Abraxas programs include education, individual and group counseling, social skills training, physical training, community service and substance abuse treatment. The educational schools -5- within Cornell Abraxas are accredited, whereby graduating juveniles are eligible to receive a full high school diploma as an alternative to the traditional General Educational Development ("G.E.D.") certificate. The three largest facilities operated by Cornell Abraxas include: (i) the Cornell Abraxas 1 program ("A-1"); (ii) the Leadership Development Program (the "LDP") and (iii) Cornell Abraxas of Ohio. A-1's property is comprised of approximately 16 buildings situated on approximately 100 acres with an aggregate offender capacity of 204 beds. Located in the Allegheny National Forest, A-1 operates as an open residential facility for the treatment of delinquent and/or dependent males who have substance abuse problems and/or are involved in the sale of a controlled substance. A-1 also operates a licensed school which offers a full range of educational services and interscholastic sports programs. While at A-1, juvenile offenders may earn a high school diploma, pursue vocational tracks or receive G.E.D. instruction and testing. The LDP is conducted on property leased by the Company, located on approximately 3.5 acres in South Mountain, Pennsylvania. The LDP is a 15-week residential treatment program with a wilderness component. The program includes group counseling, substance abuse treatment and licensed educational programs. Cornell Abraxas of Ohio's facility is located on approximately 80 acres in north central Ohio and has an offender capacity of 108 beds. This residential program offers a comprehensive substance abuse treatment and education program for males. Individuals participate in intensive group curriculum which includes a wide variety of topics such as: stages of denial, self-help tools for recovery, goal setting, values, beliefs and morals, relapse process and prevention and sex education. Individuals may earn a high school diploma, pursue vocational tracks or receive G.E.D. instruction and testing. The non-residential community-based programs transition juvenile offenders from residential placement back to their home communities. The Company provides in-home counseling and intensive case management services while integrating an array of community resources into a comprehensive plan. This dual role of service provider and intermediary serves to bridge the gap between residential facilities and the community. The Company utilizes therapists and consulting psychologists in its multi-level treatment programs. The Company intends to pursue additional contract awards to provide juvenile detention and correctional services, and to continue to increase its number of contracts for specialized rehabilitation programs and services for juvenile offenders such as wilderness programs and secure education and training centers. PRE-RELEASE CORRECTIONAL SERVICES. At December 31, 1998, the Company operated 18 facilities with an aggregate offender capacity of 1,973 beds that provide pre-release correctional services. For a listing of facility locations and the contracting agency, see "Facilities." Most residents of these facilities are or will be serving the last three to six months of their sentences and preparing for re-entry into society. At its pre-release facilities, the Company typically provides minimum security residential services, institutional food services, general education programs, life skills and employment training, job placement assistance and chemical dependency and substance abuse counseling. About 20% of the offenders at the FBOP pre-release facilities in California, Utah and Texas are on home confinement; monitoring is primarily done by required check-ins and by unscheduled visits to places of residence and employment. - 6 - FACILITIES As of December 31, 1998, the Company operated 51 facilities and had been awarded contracts to operate two additional facilities that are currently under construction or renovation. In addition to providing management services, the Company has been involved in the development, design and/or construction of many of these facilities. The facilities currently under development are the Cornell Abraxas Youth Center, which commenced operations during the first quarter of 1999, and the New Morgan Academy scheduled to open in 2000. The following table summarizes certain additional information with respect to contracts and facilities under operation by the Company as of December 31, 1998:
PRINCIPAL COMMENCE- CONTRACTING TOTAL INITIAL MENT COMPANY GOVERNMENT OFFENDER CONTRACT OF CURRENT TERM RENEWAL OWNED/ FACILITY NAME AND LOCATION AGENCY CAPACITY(1) DATE(2) CONTRACT (YEARS)(3) OPTION(4) LEASED - - ---------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------- -------- ------- SECURE INSTITUTIONAL CORRECTIONAL AND DETENTION FACILITIES: Baker Community Correctional Facility ....... CDC 288 1987 7/97 1 1/2 None Leased Baker, California (5) Big Spring Complex .......................... FBOP(6) 1,947 (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) Big Spring, Texas D. Ray James Prison ......................... State of 1,625(8) 1998 9/98 1 Nine Owned Charlton County, Georgia Georgia One-Year Great Plains Correctional Facility .......... (9) 812 (9) 7/98 (9) (9) (9) Owned Hinton, Oklahoma (5) Chesney Community Correctional Facility ..... CDC 270 1988 4/93 6 1/2 None Leased Live Oak, California (5) Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility..... Santa Fe 672 1997 7/97 3 Two (11) Santa Fe, New Mexico (10) County One-Year Wyatt Detention Facility .................... USMS(12) 302 1992 11/93 5(12) (12) (11) Central Falls, Rhode Island (5) JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL AND DETENTION FACILITIES: RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES: Cornell Abraxas I ........................... (13) 204 1973 7/98 1 Annual Owned Marienville, Pennsylvania Cornell Abraxas II .......................... (13) 23 1974 7/98 1 Annual Owned Erie, Pennsylvania Cornell Abraxas III ......................... (13) 24 1975 7/98 1 Annual Owned Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Cornell Abraxas Center for Adolescent Females .................................. (13) 43 1989 7/98 1 Annual Owned Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Cornell Abraxas of Ohio ..................... (13) 108 1993 7/98 1 Annual Owned Shelby, Ohio Cornell Abraxas Youth Center ................ (13) 70 1999 3/99 1 Annual Leased South Mountain, Pennsylvania Danville Center for Adolescent Females ...... (13) 64 1998 2/98 1 Annual (11) Danville, Pennsylvania Griffin Juvenile Facility ................... Bexar 150 1996 7/98 Annual None Owned San Antonio, Texas County Leadership Development Program .............. (13) 120 1994 7/98 1 Annual Leased South Mountain, Pennsylvania New Morgan Academy .......................... (14) 180 (14) (14) (14) (14) Leased New Morgan, Pennsylvania
(TABLE CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE) - 7 -
PRINCIPAL COMMENCE- CONTRACTING TOTAL INITIAL MENT COMPANY GOVERNMENT OFFENDER CONTRACT OF CURRENT TERM RENEWAL OWNED/ FACILITY NAME AND LOCATION AGENCY CAPACITY(1) DATE(2) CONTRACT (YEARS)(3) OPTION(4) LEASED - - ----------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------- ------- -------- ---------- --------- ------- RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES: (CONTINUED) Psychosocial Rehabilitation Unit .................... (13) 13 1994 7/98 1 Annual Owned Erie, Pennsylvania Salt Lake Valley Juvenile Detention Facility......... State of 160 1996 6/96 3 None (11) Salt Lake City, Utah Utah (15) Santa Fe County Juvenile Detention Facility ......... Santa Fe 115 1997 7/97 3 Two (11) Santa Fe, New Mexico (10) County One-Year South Mountain Secure Residential Treatment Unit .... (13) 52 1997 10/98 1 Annual (11) South Mountain, Pennsylvania NON-RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY-BASED CENTERS: Adams County Mental Health .......................... (13) 25 1998 7/98 1 Annual Leased Oxford, Pennsylvania Bensalem School ..................................... (13) 120 1994 7/98 1 Annual Leased Bensalem, Pennsylvania (16) Day Treatment Program ............................... (13) 28 1996 7/98 1 Annual Leased Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Dauphin County Mental Health ........................ (13) 150 1996 7/98 1 Annual Leased Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Erie Mental Health .................................. (13) 30 1997 7/98 1 Annual Leased Erie, Pennsylvania Lycoming County Mental Health ....................... (13) 25 1998 7/98 1 Annual Leased Williamsport, Pennsylvania Mental Health Clinic ................................ (13) 40 1996 7/98 1 Annual Leased Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Non-Residential Care ................................ (13) 20 1991 7/98 1 Annual Leased Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Philadelphia Family Preservation/SCOH ............... (13) 64 1992 7/98 1 Annual Owned Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Supervised Home Services ............................ (13) 33 1994 7/98 1 Annual Leased Milford, Delaware Supervised Home Services ............................ (13) 25 1992 7/98 1 Annual Leased Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania Supervised Home Services/Home Detention.............. (13) 50 1993 7/98 1 Annual Leased District of Columbia Workbridge .......................................... (13) 375 1994 7/98 1 Annual Leased Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Workbridge .......................................... (13) 325 1998 7/98 1 Annual Leased Philadelphia, Pennsylvania PRE-RELEASE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES: Cordova Center ...................................... ADC 192 1985 12/97 3 None Owned Anchorage, Alaska (5) Dallas County Judicial Center ....................... Dallas 300 1991 9/98 1 None Leased Wilmer, Texas County Durham Center ....................................... NCDC 75 1996 12/96 4 1/2 One Leased Durham, North Carolina Five-Year El Monte Center ..................................... FBOP 52 1993 10/97 1 Four Leased El Monte, California (5) One-Year Inglewood Men's Center .............................. CDC 53 1982 7/94 4 (17) (17) Leased Inglewood, California
(TABLE CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE) - 8 -
PRINCIPAL COMMENCE- CONTRACTING TOTAL INITIAL MENT COMPANY GOVERNMENT OFFENDER CONTRACT OF CURRENT TERM RENEWAL OWNED/ FACILITY NAME AND LOCATION AGENCY CAPACITY(1) DATE(2) CONTRACT (YEARS)(3) OPTION(4) LEASED - - ----------------------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ------- -------- ---------- --------- -------- PRE-RELEASE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES: (CONTINUED) Leidel Community Correctional Center ......... FBOP 150 1996 1/96 3 Two Owned Houston, Texas (5) One-Year Marvin Gardens Center ........................ CDC 42 1981 1/99 5 None Leased Los Angeles, California (5) Midtown Center ............................... ADC 32 1998 2/98 3 None Owned Anchorage, Alaska Northstar Center ............................. ADC 105 1990 12/97 3 None Leased Fairbanks, Alaska (5) Oakland Center ............................... FBOP(18) 61 1981 9/98 2 None Leased Oakland, California (5) Parkview Center .............................. ADC 112 1993 11/96 3 None Leased Anchorage, Alaska (5) Reid Community Correctional Center ........... TDCJ 310 1996 9/98 1 None Owned Houston, Texas Salt Lake City Center ........................ FBOP(15) 58 1995 12/95 2 Three Leased Salt Lake City, Utah (5) One-Year San Diego Center ............................. FBOP 50 1984 11/95 2 Three Leased San Diego, California (5) One-Year San Diego Drug Aftercare Program.............. FBOP 80 1998 10/98 2 None Leased San Diego, California Santa Barbara Center ......................... FBOP 25 1996 3/96 2 Three Leased Santa Barbara, California (5) One-Year Taylor Street Center ......................... (19) 177 1984 (19) (19) (19) Leased San Francisco, California (5) Tundra Center ................................ ADC 99 1986 12/97 4 None Owned Bethel, Alaska
- - ---------- (1) Total offender capacity includes design capacity plus the program capacity of the non-residential community-based operations. Design capacity is based on the physical space available presently, or with minimal additional expenditure, for offender or residential beds in compliance with relevant regulations and contract requirements. In certain cases, the management contract for a facility provides for a lower number of beds. (2) Date from which the Company, or its predecessor, has had a contract with the contracting governmental agency on an uninterrupted basis. (3) Substantially all contracts are terminable by the contracting governmental agency for any reason upon the required notice to the Company. (4) Except as otherwise noted, the renewal option, if any, is at the discretion of the contracting governmental agency. (5) Facility is accredited by the American Correctional Association. (6) The City of Big Spring entered into the IGA with the FBOP for an indefinite term (until modified or terminated) with respect to the Big Spring Complex, which began operations during 1989. The Big Spring Operating Agreement has a term of 20 years with three five-year renewal options at the Company's discretion, pursuant to which the Company manages the Big Spring Complex for the City of Big Spring. With respect to the 560 bed expansion of the Big Spring Complex, the portion of the Big Spring Operating Agreement relating to the expansion has a term of 30 years with four five-year renewal options at the Company's discretion. (7) In connection with the acquisition of MidTex, and as part of the purchase price, the Company prepaid a majority of the facility costs related to three of the Big Spring Complex units through at least the year 2030. The Company owns the 560 bed expansion unit constructed in 1998. (8) The Company is currently operating 550 beds and expects to phase-in the remaining 1,075 beds during 1999. (9) The prison is operated pursuant to a one-year contract with nine one-year renewal options between the Oklahoma Department of Corrections and HEDA. HEDA in turn has subcontracted the operations to the Company under a 30-year operating contract with four five-year renewals. (10) The Company took over the operation of an existing 240 bed adult and juvenile facility on July 1, 1997, while beginning construction of a new 672 bed adult detention facility, which was completed in the second quarter of 1998. The offenders housed in the 240 bed facility were transferred to the new 672 bed detention facility and the 240 bed facility was converted into a 115 bed juvenile detention facility. (11) The Company does not incur any facility use costs for these facilities which are owned by a governmental agency or by the contracting agency. (FOOTNOTES CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE) - 9 - (12) The USMS entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation ("DFC") in August 1991 for an indefinite term (until modified or terminated) with respect to the Wyatt Detention Facility. The DFC, in turn, entered into a Professional Management Agreement with the Company for the Company to operate this facility effective November 1993 for a term of five years. The Company is currently finalizing a contract with a term of three years with one two-year renewal option. (13) The Cornell Abraxas programs/facilities contract with numerous counties throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, Delaware and with the District of Columbia. (14) The facility is currently under development and construction. The Company anticipates obtaining contracts with various counties when construction is complete in 2000. (15) Utah Department of Human Services, Division of Youth Corrections. (16) Operates within Pennsylvania Youth Department Center/State Facility. (17) The current contract, which expired in July 1998, was extended by the CDC for six months. The contract is currently out for bid. (18) In addition to its contract with the FBOP with respect to these facilities, the Company has contracts with the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Pretrial Services to provide beds at these facilities. (19) The Company has a contract with the FBOP for 53 beds for the period February 1996 through January 2001 and with the CDC for 40 beds for the period July 1998 through June 2003. The Company also contracts with Pretrial Services for 5 beds. FACILITY MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS The Company is compensated on the basis of the number of offenders held or supervised under each of its facilities' management contracts. The Company's existing facility management contracts generally provide that the Company will be compensated at an occupant per diem rate. Such compensation is invoiced in accordance with applicable law and is typically paid on a monthly basis. Under a per diem rate structure, a decrease in occupancy rates would cause a decrease in revenues and profitability. The Company is, therefore, dependent upon governmental agencies to supply the Company's facilities with a sufficient number of offenders to meet the contract capacities, and in most cases such governmental agencies are under no obligation to do so. Moreover, because certain of the Company's facilities have offenders serving relatively short sentences or only the last three to six months of their sentences, the high turnover rate of offenders requires a constant influx of new offenders from the relevant governmental agencies to provide sufficient occupancies to achieve profitability. Occupancy rates during the start-up phase when facilities are first opened typically result in capacity underutilization for 30 to 90 days. After a management contract has been awarded, the Company incurs facility start-up costs consisting principally of initial employee training, travel and other direct expenses incurred in connection with the contract. These costs vary by contract. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." All the Company's contracts are subject to legislative appropriations. A failure by a governmental agency to receive appropriations could result in termination of the contract by such agency or a reduction of the management fee payable to the Company. To date, the Company has not lost a material contract due to a governmental agency not receiving appropriations, although no assurance can be given that the governmental agencies will continue to receive appropriations in all cases. The Company's contracts generally require the Company to operate each facility in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company is required by its contracts to maintain certain levels of insurance coverage for general liability, workers' compensation, vehicle liability and property loss or damage. The Company is also required to indemnify the contracting agency for claims and costs arising out of the Company's operations, and in certain cases, to maintain performance bonds. The Company's facility management contracts typically have terms ranging from one to five years and many have one or more renewal options for terms ranging from one to five years. Only the contracting governmental agency may exercise a renewal option. To date, all but one renewal option under the Company's management contracts have been exercised. In connection with the exercise of the renewal option, the contracting governmental agency or the Company typically has requested changes or adjustments to the contract terms. Additionally, the Company's facility management contracts typically allow a contracting governmental agency to terminate a contract without cause by giving the Company written notice ranging from 30 to 180 days. To date, no contracts have been terminated before expiration. - 10 - MARKETING AND DEVELOPMENT The Company's principal customers are federal, state and local governmental agencies responsible for adult and juvenile correctional, detention and pre-release services. These governmental agencies generally procure services from the private sector by issuing a Request for Proposal ("RFP") to which a number of companies may respond. Most of the Company's efforts in securing new business are expected to be in the form of responding to RFPs. As part of the Company's process of responding to RFPs, management of the Company meets with appropriate personnel from the requesting agency to best determine the agency's distinct needs. If the Company believes that the project complies with its business strategy, the Company will submit a written response to the RFP. When responding to RFPs, the Company incurs costs, typically ranging from $10,000 to $75,000 per proposal, to determine the prospective client's distinct needs and prepare a detailed response to the RFP. In addition, the Company may incur substantial costs to acquire options to lease or purchase land for a proposed facility and engage outside consulting and legal expertise related to a particular RFP. The preparation of a response to an RFP typically takes from five to 10 weeks. A typical RFP requires bidders to provide detailed information, including, but not limited to, descriptions of the following: the services to be provided by the bidder, the bidder's experience and qualifications and the price at which the bidder is willing to provide the services requested by the agency (which services may include the renovation, improvement or expansion of an existing facility or the planning, design and construction of a new facility). Based on proposals received in response to an RFP, the governmental agency will award a contract; however, the governmental agency does not necessarily award a contract to the lowest bidder. In addition to costs, governmental agencies also consider experience and qualifications of bidders in awarding contracts. The development process for obtaining facility management contracts consists of several steps. These include issuance of an RFP by a governmental agency, submission of a response to the RFP by the Company, the award of the contract by a governmental agency and the commencement of construction or operation of the facility. The Company's experience has been that a substantial period of time may elapse from the initial inquiry to receipt of a new contract, although, as the concept of privatization has gained wider acceptance, the length of time from inquiry to the award of contract has shortened. The length of time required to award a contract is also affected, in some cases, by the need to introduce enabling legislation. The bidding and award process for an RFP typically takes from three to nine months. Generally, if the facility for which an award has been made must be constructed, the Company's experience has been that a newly constructed facility typically commences operations between 12 and 24 months after the governmental agency's award. The Company also at times receives inquiries from or on behalf of governmental agencies that are considering privatization of certain facilities or that have already decided to contract with private providers. When such an inquiry is received, the Company determines whether there is a need for the Company's services and whether the legal and political climate in which the governmental agency operates is conducive to serious consideration of privatization. The Company then conducts an initial cost analysis to further determine project feasibility. When a contract requires construction of a new facility, the Company's success depends, in part, upon its ability to acquire real property for its facilities on desirable terms and at satisfactory locations. Management of the Company expects that many such locations will be in or near populous areas and therefore anticipates legal action and other forms of opposition from residents in areas surrounding certain proposed sites. The Company may incur significant expenses in responding to such opposition and there can be no assurance of success. In addition, the Company may choose not to bid in response to an RFP or may determine to withdraw a bid if legal action or other forms of opposition are anticipated. - 11 - OPERATIONS Pursuant to the terms of its management contracts, the Company is responsible for the overall operation of its facilities, including staff recruitment, general administration of the facilities, security and supervision of the offenders and facility maintenance. The Company also provides a variety of rehabilitative and educational programs at many of its facilities. Offenders at most adult facilities managed by the Company may receive basic education through academic programs designed to improve offender literacy levels (including English as a second language programs) and the opportunity to acquire G.E.D. certificates. Programs for offenders at the Company's juvenile facilities typically have an increased emphasis on education and counseling. At many facilities, the Company also offers vocational training to offenders who lack marketable job skills. In addition, the Company offers life skills, transition planning programs that provide offenders job search training and employment skills, health education, financial responsibility training and other skills associated with becoming productive citizens. At several of its facilities, the Company also offers counseling, education and/or treatment to offenders with chemical dependency or substance abuse problems. The Company operates each facility in accordance with Company-wide policies and procedures generally based on the standards and guidelines established by the American Correctional Association ("ACA") Commission on Accreditation and/or the appropriate licensing agencies (collectively "Accreditation Standards"). The ACA is an independent organization comprised of professionals in the corrections industry which establishes guidelines and standards by which a correctional institution may gain accreditation. The Accreditation Standards describe specific objectives to be accomplished and cover such areas as administration, personnel and staff training, security, medical and health care, food service, offender supervision and physical plant requirements. Internal quality control, conducted by senior facility staff and executive officers of the Company, takes the form of periodic operational, programming and fiscal audits; facility inspections; regular review of logs, reports and files; and strict maintenance of personnel standards, including an active training program. Each of the Company's facilities develops its own training plan that is reviewed, evaluated and updated annually. Dedicated space and equipment for training is provided and outside resources such as community colleges are utilized in the training process. All adult correctional officers undergo a minimum 40-hour orientation upon their hiring and receive academy-level training amounting to 120 hours and on-the-job training of up to 80 hours. Each correctional officer also receives up to 40 hours of training and education annually. All juvenile treatment employees undergo a minimum 80-hour orientation upon their hiring and also receive up to 40 hours of training and education annually. Cornell Abraxas has received awards and recognition for its operations and programs, including being recognized (i) in 1995 by the Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Judges' Commission as "Residential Program of the Year" and (ii) in 1994 by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention in its Program Report titled "What Works: Promising Interventions in Juvenile Justice." FACILITY DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND FINANCE In addition to operating correctional facilities, the Company also provides consultation and management services to governmental agencies with respect to the development, design and construction of new correctional and detention facilities and the redesign and renovation of older facilities. The Company or its predecessors have consulted on and/or managed the development, design and/or construction of a number of facilities in each of its operating divisions. - 12 - During 1998, the Company completed the development, design and construction of: (i) the 560 bed expansion of the Big Spring Complex; (ii) the 672 bed adult detention facility in Santa Fe, New Mexico and (iii) various facility expansions. Additionally, the Company completed a portion (550 beds) of the D. Ray James Prison in Charlton, Georgia in the fourth quarter of 1998. The construction of the remaining 1,075 beds is expected to be completed in the first half of 1999. Currently, the Company operates all of the facilities it has developed, designed and constructed with the exception of the detention center in Plymouth, Massachusetts, which is operated by the Sheriff's Department of the County of Plymouth, Massachusetts. The Company utilizes an experienced team of outside professional architectural consultants as part of the group that participates from conceptual design through final construction of a project. When designing a facility, the Company's outside architects utilize, with appropriate modifications, prototype designs the Company has previously used in developing projects. Management of the Company believes that the use of such proven designs allows the Company to reduce cost overruns and avoid construction delays. Additionally, the Company designs its facilities with the intention to improve security and minimize the personnel needed to properly staff the facility by enabling enhanced visual and electronic surveillance of the facility. The Company may propose various construction financing structures to the contracting governmental agencies. The governmental agency may finance, or the Company may arrange for the financing of, the construction of such facilities through various methods including, but not limited to, the following: (i) a one-time general revenue appropriation by the governmental agency for the cost of the new facility; (ii) general obligation bonds that are secured by either a limited or unlimited tax levy by the issuing governmental entity or (iii) lease revenue bonds or certificates of participation secured by an annual lease payment that is subject to annual or bi-annual legislative appropriations. If the project is financed using project-specific tax-exempt bonds or other obligations, the construction contract is generally subject to the sale of such bonds or obligations. Substantial expenditures for construction will not be made on such a project until the tax-exempt bonds or other obligations are sold. If such bonds or obligations are not sold, construction and management of the facility will be delayed until alternate financing is procured or development of the project will be entirely suspended. When the Company is awarded a facility management contract, appropriations for the first annual or bi-annual period of the contract's term have generally already been approved, and the contract is subject to governmental appropriations for subsequent annual or bi-annual periods. The Company has in the past worked with governmental agencies and placement agents to obtain and structure financing for construction of facilities. In some cases, an unrelated special purpose corporation is established to incur borrowings to finance construction and, in other cases, the Company directly incurs borrowings for construction financing. A growing trend in the privatization industry is the requirement by governmental agencies that private operators make capital investments in new facilities and enter into direct financing arrangements in connection with the development of such facilities. There can be no assurance that the Company will have available capital if and when required to make such an investment to secure a contract for developing a facility. - 13 - COMPETITION The Company competes with a number of companies, including, but not limited to, Corrections Corporation of America, Wackenhut Corrections Corporation, Youth Services International, Inc. and Correctional Services Corporation. The Company also competes in some markets with small local companies that may have better knowledge of local conditions and may be better able to gain political and public acceptance. In addition, the Company may compete in some markets with governmental agencies that operate correctional and detention facilities. EMPLOYEES At December 31, 1998, the Company had approximately 2,333 full-time employees and 621 part-time employees. The Company employs management, administrative and clerical, security, educational and counseling services, health services and general maintenance personnel. Approximately 150 employees at two of the Company's facilities are represented by unions. The Company is currently negotiating over terms for an agreement at a third facility with approximately 35 employees. The Company believes its relations with its employees are good. REGULATIONS The industry in which the Company operates is subject to federal, state and local regulations administered by a variety of regulatory authorities. Generally, prospective providers of correctional, detention and pre-release services must comply with a variety of applicable state and local regulations, including education, healthcare and safety regulations. The Company's contracts frequently include extensive reporting requirements and require supervision with on-site monitoring by representatives of contracting governmental agencies. In addition to regulations requiring certain contracting governmental agencies to enter into a competitive bidding procedure before awarding contracts, the laws of certain jurisdictions may also require the Company to award subcontracts on a competitive basis or to subcontract with businesses owned by women or members of minority groups. INSURANCE The Company maintains a $10 million per occurrence per facility general liability insurance policy for all its operations. The Company also maintains insurance in amounts it deems adequate to cover property and casualty risks, workers' compensation and directors' and officers' liability. The Company's contracts and the statutes of certain states in which the Company operates typically require the maintenance of insurance by the Company. The Company's contracts provide that, in the event the Company does not maintain such insurance, the contracting agency may terminate its agreement with the Company. The Company believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with respect to these requirements. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The Company leases corporate headquarters office space in Houston, Texas and divisional administrative offices in Ventura, California and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The Company also leases various facilities it is currently operating or developing. For a listing of owned and leased facilities, see "Business - Facilities." - 14 - ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company currently and from time to time is subject to claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including claims for damages for personal injuries or for wrongful restriction of, or interference with, offender privileges and employment matters. In the opinion of management of the Company, the outcome of the proceedings to which the Company is currently a party will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company's operations or financial condition. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS No matters were submitted to the Company's security holders during the fourth quarter of 1998. PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC. COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The common stock of the Company is currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "CRN." As of February 26, 1999, there were approximately 47 record holders of common stock. The high and low closing sales prices for the common stock since the common stock began trading on October 3, 1996, are shown below: HIGH LOW ---- --- 1996: Fourth Quarter (from October 3). $12 3/4 $ 8 7/8 1997: First Quarter................... 11 5/8 9 Second Quarter.................. 18 9 Third Quarter................... 16 5/8 14 7/16 Fourth Quarter.................. 20 3/4 15 3/4 1998: First Quarter................... 24 1/2 19 7/16 Second Quarter.................. 25 7/16 18 1/2 Third Quarter................... 21 1/16 8 Fourth Quarter.................. 19 11 1999: First Quarter (through February 26)................... 19 7/8 16 1/4 The Company has never declared or paid cash dividends on its capital stock. The Company currently intends to retain excess cash flow, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of its business and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends is within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon, among other factors, the Company's results of operations; financial condition; capital requirements; restrictions, if any, imposed by financing commitments and legal requirements. The Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 3, 1998 ("1998 Credit Facility") currently prohibits the payment of dividends. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources". - 15 - ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this report.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 (1) 1997 (2) 1996 (3) 1995 1994 (4) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenues .................................................. $ 123,119 $ 70,302 $ 32,327 $ 20,692 $ 15,689 Operating expenses ........................................ 98,721 57,047 26,038 16,351 12,315 Depreciation and amortization ............................. 4,228 2,231 1,390 820 758 General and administrative expenses ....................... 7,581 5,394 4,560 3,531 2,959 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Income (loss) from operations ............................. 12,589 5,630 339 (10) (343) Interest expense (5) ...................................... 2,601 491 2,810 1,115 294 Interest income ........................................... (116) (414) (167) (136) (138) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Income (loss) before income taxes ......................... 10,104 5,553 (2,304) (989) (499) Provision for income taxes ................................ 4,042 1,999 75 -- 101 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income (loss) ......................................... $ 6,062 $ 3,554 $ (2,379) $ (989) $ (600) ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= Earnings (loss) per share: - Basic .............................................. $ .64 $ .48 $ (.65) $ (.32) $ (.21) - Diluted ............................................ $ .62 $ .46 $ (.65) $ (.32) $ (.21) Number of shares used to compute EPS (in thousands) (6): - Basic .............................................. 9,442 7,350 3,673 3,095 2,923 - Diluted ............................................ 9,772 7,740 3,673 3,095 2,923 OPERATING DATA: Total offender capacity: Residential ............................................... 9,135 6,172 3,577 1,640 1,281 Non-residential community-based ........................... 1,390 900 -- -- -- Total .................................................. 10,525 7,072 3,577 1,640 1,281 Contracted offender capacity in operation (end of period) ........................................... 8,700 5,061 2,899 1,135 1,155 Contracted beds in operation (end of period) (7) ............. 7,310 4,161 2,899 1,135 1,155 Average occupancy based on contracted beds in operation (7) (8) ................................. 93.8% 97.6% 97.0% 98.9% 92.1% BALANCE SHEET DATA: Working capital ........................................... $ 16,828 $ 26,220 $ 7,747 $ 1,525 $ 2,015 Total assets .............................................. 212,695 104,109 46,824 14,184 13,095 Long-term debt ............................................ 98,480 432 745 7,649 3,447 Stockholders' equity ...................................... 91,500 86,730 41,051 3,053 6,631
- - ---------- (1) Includes the operations of the Great Plains Correctional Facility acquired in January 1998 and the Alaska facilities purchased from Allvest in August 1998. (2) Includes the operations of Interventions and Abraxas acquired in January 1997 and September 1997, respectively. (3) Includes the operations of the Big Spring Complex and the Reid Center acquired in July 1996 and May 1996, respectively. (4) Includes the operations of Eclectic purchased by the Company on March 31, 1994. (5) Interest expense for 1996 includes a $1.3 million non-recurring charge ($726,000 of which was non-cash) to expense deferred financing costs associated with the early retirement of debt. (6) Prior to March 31, 1994, the Company was organized as a partnership. For purposes of computing average shares outstanding for the period prior to March 31, 1994, the partnership units were converted to common shares using a one-to-one unit-to-share conversion ratio. (7) Occupancy percentages are based on contracted offender capacity of residential facilities in operation. Since certain facilities have offender capacities that exceed contracted capacities, occupancy percentages can exceed 100% of contracted capacity. (8) For any applicable facilities, includes reduced occupancy during the start-up phase. - 16 - ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS GENERAL The Company provides integrated facility development, design, construction and operational services to governmental agencies within three operating divisions: (i) secure institutional correctional and detention services; (ii) juvenile treatmen, educational and detention services and (iii) pre-release correctional services. The following table sets forth total offender capacity, the contracted offender capacity and beds in operation at the end of the periods shown, and the average occupancy percentage for the year then ended. DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 1998 1997 1996 ------ ------ ----- Total offender capacity: Residential..................................... 9,135 6,172 3,577 Non-residential community-based................. 1,390 900 -- Total......................................... 10,525 7,072 3,577 Contracted offender capacity in operation (end of period)............................... 8,700 5,061 2,899 Contracted beds in operation (end of period) (1)... 7,310 4,161 2,899 Average occupancy based on contracted beds in operation (1) (2)............................. 93.8% 97.6% 97.0% - - ----------- (1) Occupancy percentages are based on contracted offender capacity of residential facilities in operation. Since certain facilities have offender capacities that exceed contracted capacities, occupancy percentages can exceed 100% of contracted capacity. (2) For any applicable facilities, includes reduced occupancy during the start-up phase. The Company derives substantially all its revenues from operating correctional, detention and pre-release facilities for federal, state and local governmental agencies in the United States. Revenues for operation of correctional, detention and pre-release facilities are generally recognized on a per diem rate based upon the number of occupant days for the period. Factors which the Company considers in determining the per diem rate to charge include: (i) the programs specified by the contract and the related staffing levels; (ii) wage levels customary in the respective geographic areas; (iii) whether the proposed facility is to be leased or purchased and (iv) the anticipated average occupancy levels which the Company believes could reasonably be maintained. The Company's operating margins generally vary from facility to facility (regardless of whether the facility is secure institutional, juvenile or pre-release) based on the level of competition for the contract award, the proposed length of the contract, the occupancy levels for a facility, the level of capital commitment required with respect to a facility and the anticipated changes in operating costs, if any, over the term of the contract. The Company is responsible for all facility operating expenses, except for certain debt service and lease payments with respect to facilities for which the Company has only a management contract (six facilities in operation at December 31, 1998). - 17 - A majority of the Company's facility operating expenses consist of fixed costs. These fixed costs include lease and rental expense, insurance, utilities and depreciation. As a result, when the Company commences operation of new or expanded facilities, fixed operating expenses increase. The amount of the Company's variable operating expenses, including food, medical services, supplies and clothing, depend on occupancy levels at the facilities operated by the Company. The Company's largest single operating expense, facility payroll expense and related employment taxes and costs, has both a fixed and a variable component. The Company can adjust the staffing and payroll to a certain extent based on occupancy at a facility, but a minimum fixed number of employees is required to operate and maintain any facility regardless of occupancy levels. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries of the Company's corporate and administrative personnel who provide senior management, accounting, finance, human resources, payroll, information systems and other services, and costs of business development. Newly opened facilities are staffed according to contract requirements when the Company begins receiving offenders. Offenders are typically assigned to a newly opened facility on a phased-in basis over a one- to three-month period. The Company may incur start-up operating losses at new facilities until break-even occupancy levels are reached. Quarterly results can be substantially affected by the timing of the commencement of operations as well as development and construction of new facilities. Working capital requirements generally increase immediately prior to the Company's commencing management of a new facility as the Company incurs start-up costs and purchases necessary equipment and supplies before facility management revenue is realized. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Company's historical operating results reflect a significant expansion of the Company's business since 1996. Material fluctuations in the Company's results of operations are principally the result of the timing and effect of acquisitions, the level of development activity conducted by the Company, and occupancy rates at Company-operated facilities. The Company's acquisitions to date have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, whereby the operating results of the acquired businesses have been reported in the Company's operating results since the date of acquisition. The Company's income from operations as a percentage of revenues fluctuates depending on the relative mix of operating contracts among the Company's three operating divisions. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the percentages of revenues represented by certain items in the Company's historical consolidated statements of operations. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------- 1998 1997 1996 ------ ------ ----- Revenues............................................. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Operating expenses................................... 80.2 81.1 80.5 Depreciation and amortization........................ 3.4 3.2 4.3 General and administrative expenses.................. 6.2 7.7 14.1 ----- ----- ----- Income from operations............................... 10.2 8.0 1.1 Interest expense, net................................ 2.0 0.1 8.2 ----- ----- ----- Income (loss) before income taxes.................... 8.2 7.9 (7.1) Provision for income taxes........................... 3.3 2.8 0.2 ----- ----- ----- Net income (loss).................................... 4.9% 5.1% (7.3)% ===== ===== ===== - 18 - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 REVENUES. Revenues increased by 75.1% to $123.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1998, from $70.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1997. Secure institutional division revenues increased 63.0% to $52.6 million in 1998 from $32.3 million in 1997, due principally to the purchase of the Great Plains Correctional Facility in January 1998; a full year of operations at the Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility, which commenced in July 1997; and the 560 bed expansion unit at the Big Spring Complex and the opening of the D. Ray James Prison, both of which began operations in the fourth quarter of 1998. Juvenile division revenues increased 153.7 % to $47.0 million in 1998 from $18.5 million in 1997, due principally to a full year of results from the Abraxas acquisition in September 1997, additional programs which began in 1998 and expansions of various facilities. Pre-release division revenues increased 20.4% to $23.5 million in 1998 from $19.5 million in 1997, due principally to the acquisition of Allvest in August 1998. OPERATING EXPENSES. Operating expenses increased 73.1% to $98.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1998, from $57.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1997. Secure institutional division operating expenses increased 51.0% to $37.8 million in 1998 from $25.1 million in 1997, due principally to the purchase of the Great Plains Correctional Facility in January 1998; a full year of operations at the Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility, which commenced in July 1997; and the 560 bed expansion unit at the Big Spring Complex and the opening of the D. Ray James Prison, both of which began operations in the fourth quarter of 1998. As a percentage of revenues, secure institutional division operating expenses were 71.9% in 1998 and 77.6% in 1997. The higher operating margin in 1998 versus 1997 was due principally to a greater mix of owned versus leased facilities, including the Great Plains Correctional Facility, offset in part by lower operating margins at start-up facilities such as the expansion unit at the Big Spring Complex, the D. Ray James Prison and the Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility. Juvenile division operating expenses increased 159.1% to $41.2 million in 1998 from $15.9 million in 1997, due principally to a full year of results from the Abraxas acquisition in September 1997, additional programs which began in 1998 and expansions of various facilities. As a percentage of revenues, juvenile division operating expenses were 87.7% in 1998 and 85.9% in 1997. The lower operating margin in 1998 versus 1997 was due principally to an increase in juvenile programs which are funded on a cost-plus basis and the results of the Griffin Juvenile Facility, which has experienced lower occupancy in 1998. Pre-release division operating expenses increased 17.5% to $18.7 million in 1998 from $15.9 million in 1997, due principally to the acquisition of Allvest in August 1998. As a percentage of revenues, pre-release division operating expenses were 79.8% in 1998 and 81.8% in 1997. The higher operating margin in 1998 versus 1997 was due principally to a greater mix of owned versus leased facilities, including those acquired as part of the Allvest acquisition. DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization increased 89.5% to $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1998, from $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1997, due principally to depreciation of buildings and equipment acquired from Abraxas in September 1997, the Great Plains Correctional Facility purchased in January 1998, the 560 bed expansion unit at the Big Spring Complex, the opening of the D. Ray James Prison and various facility expansions and related equipment. - 19 - GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses increased 40.5% to $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1998, from $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1997. The increase in general and administrative expenses resulted from additional corporate, business development and administrative personnel needed to manage the increased business of the Company and for development of new contracts. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 6.2% from 7.7%, due principally to spreading the costs over a larger revenue base. INTEREST. Interest expense, net of interest income, increased to $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1998, from $77,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997. The increase in net interest expense was principally due to borrowings under the Company's 1997 Credit Facility for the purchase of the Great Plains Correctional Facility in January 1998, for the acquisition of Allvest in August 1998 and for working capital for various new programs and facility expansions. For the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company capitalized interest totaling $2.3 million related to costs of facilities under construction and development, including the 560 bed Big Spring Complex expansion and the 1,625 bed D. Ray James Prison. INCOME TAXES. For the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company recognized a provision for income taxes at an estimated effective annual rate of 40%, compared to 36% for the year ended December 31, 1997. The effective income tax rate applied in 1997 included a benefit for the reversal of previously reserved deferred tax assets resulting from prior net operating losses. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 REVENUES. Revenues increased 117.5% to $70.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1997, from $32.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1996. Secure institutional division revenues increased 51.0% to $32.3 million in 1997 from $21.4 million in 1996, due principally to a full year of operations from the July 1996 acquisition of the Big Spring Complex (formerly MidTex) and assuming the operation of the Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility, which commenced in July 1997. Juvenile division revenues were $18.5 million in 1997 due to the September 1997 acquisition of Abraxas, the opening of the Salt Lake Valley Juvenile Detention Center in the first quarter of 1997 and the acquisition of the Griffin Juvenile Facility in January 1997. The Company did not operate any juvenile facilities in 1996. Pre-release division revenues increased 78.0% to $19.5 million in 1997 from $10.9 million in 1996, due principally to the January 1997 acquisition of the Dallas County Judicial Center (formerly part of Interventions), a full year of operations of the Reid Community Correctional Center acquired in May 1996 and the opening of the Durham Center in the first quarter of 1997. OPERATING EXPENSES. Operating expenses increased 119.1% to $57.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1997, from $26.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1996. Secure institutional division operating expenses increased 45.6% to $25.1 million in 1997 from $17.2 million in 1996, due principally to a full year of operations from the July 1996 acquisition of the Big Spring Complex and assuming the operation of the Santa Fe County Adult Detention Facility, which commenced in July 1997. As a percentage of revenues, secure institutional division operating expenses were 77.6% in 1997 and 80.5% in 1996. The higher operating margin in 1997 versus 1996 for the secure institutional division was due principally to a full year of results of the Big Spring Complex acquired in July 1996. Juvenile division operating expenses were $15.9 million in 1997, due to the September 1997 acquisition of Abraxas, the opening of the Salt Lake Valley Juvenile Detention Center in the first quarter of 1997 and the January 1997 acquisition of the Griffin Juvenile Facility. The Company did not operate any juvenile facilities in 1996. As a percentage of revenues, juvenile division operating expenses were 85.9% in 1997. - 20 - Pre-release division operating expenses increased 81.0% to $15.9 million in 1997 from $8.8 million in 1996 due principally to the January 1997 acquisition of the Dallas County Judicial Center, a full year of operations of the Reid Community Correctional Center acquired in May 1996 and the opening of the Durham Center in the first quarter of 1997. As a percentage of revenues, pre-release division operating expenses were 81.8% in 1997 and 80.5% in 1996. DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization increased 60.5% to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1997, from $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1996. The increase was due principally to a full year of amortization of prepaid facility use costs of the Big Spring Complex acquired in July 1996, depreciation of the Griffin Juvenile Facility and related assets acquired in the January 1997 acquisition of Interventions, depreciation and amortization of assets acquired in the September 1997 Abraxas acquisition and depreciation and amortization of deferred start-up costs for the three new facilities which began operations during 1997. In addition, amortization costs for 1997 included approximately $187,000 to expense start-up costs related to the non-renewal of a 120 bed juvenile contract as of June 1997. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses increased 18.3% to $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1997, from $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1996. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 1996, included a non-recurring, non-cash charge of $870,000 in connection with options to purchase shares of common stock granted in July 1996 to certain officers of the Company. Excluding the non-recurring charge, general and administrative expenses increased $1.7 million, or 46.2%, as a result of adding corporate and administrative personnel, including a new chief operating officer, to manage the increased business of the Company, and from additional costs of administering the Company since the initial public offering in the fourth quarter of 1996 ("IPO"). As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 7.7% from 11.4%, excluding the non-recurring charge, due principally to spreading fixed costs over a larger revenue base. INTEREST. Interest expense, net of interest income, decreased to $77,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, from $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1996. The decrease in net interest expense was principally due to a $1.3 million non-recurring charge ($726,000 of which was non-cash) in the third quarter of 1996 to expense deferred financing costs associated with the early retirement of a significant portion of the 1996 Credit Facility using the proceeds of the IPO. Excluding the non-recurring charge, interest expense decreased approximately $1.0 million, or 67.9%, as a result of lower outstanding borrowings under the 1996 and 1997 Credit Facilities for the respective periods. During 1997, the Company capitalized interest totaling $151,000 related to the construction and development of facilities. In addition, 1997 interest income increased $247,000, or 147.9%, as a result of interest earned on the investment of a portion of the proceeds from the Company's stock offering in October 1997. INCOME TAXES. For the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company recognized a provision for income taxes at an estimated effective rate of 36%, compared to no provision for federal income taxes for the year ended December 31, 1996, due to a taxable loss. The effective income tax rate applied in 1997 includes a benefit for the reversal of reserves for deferred tax assets resulting from prior net operating losses which were utilized in 1997 and 1998. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES GENERAL. The Company's primary capital requirements are for acquisitions; construction of new facilities; expansions of existing facilities; working capital; start-up costs related to new operating contracts; and furniture, fixtures and equipment. Working capital requirements generally increase immediately prior to the Company commencing management of a new facility as the Company incurs start-up costs and purchases necessary equipment and supplies before facility management revenue (through occupancy fees) is realized. Some of the Company's management contracts have required the Company to make substantial - 21 - initial expenditures of cash in connection with the opening or renovating of a facility. Substantially all these start-up expenditures are fully or partially recoverable as pass-through costs or are reimbursable from the contracting governmental agency over the term of the contract. WORKING CAPITAL. The Company's working capital was $16.8 million at December 31, 1998, and $26.2 million at December 31, 1997. This decrease was principally due to the use of cash to fund a portion of the Great Plains Correctional Facility purchase in January 1998. CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES. The Company had net cash provided by operating activities of $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. Significant sources of cash include $10.3 million of net income plus depreciation and amortization and an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Significant uses of operating cash during the year included start-up costs for facilities under development, including the Big Spring Complex expansion and the D. Ray James Prison, and an increase in accounts receivable due to the opening and the timing of receivable collections of various facilities. EXISTING CREDIT FACILITY. In December 1998, the Company amended and restated its existing credit agreement with a financial institution (the "1998 Credit Facility" and previously the "1997 Credit Facility"). The 1998 Credit Facility provides for borrowings of up to $60.0 million under a revolving line of credit, the availability of which is determined by the Company's projected pro forma cash flow. The 1998 Credit Facility matures in March 2003 and bears interest, at the election of the Company, at either the prime rate plus a margin of 0% to 0.5% or a rate which is 1.75% to 2.50% above the applicable LIBOR-rate. Interest is payable monthly with respect to prime-rate loans and at the expiration of the applicable LIBOR period for LIBOR-based loans. Commitment fees equal to 0.375% per annum are payable on the unused portion of the facility. The 1998 Credit Facility is secured by all of the Company's assets, including the stock of all the Company's subsidiaries, does not permit the payment of cash dividends and requires the Company to comply with certain earnings, net worth and debt service covenants. Additionally, the 1998 Credit Facility provides the Company with the ability to enter into future operating lease agreements that provide for residual value guarantees. See Note 7 - Commitments and Contingencies. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had borrowings of $48.4 million outstanding under the 1998 Credit Facility. On July 15, 1998, the Company completed a private placement of $50.0 million of Senior Secured Notes ("Senior Notes"), of which $25.0 million was issued in July 1998 and $25.0 million in August 1998. The Senior Notes, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.74%, mature on July 15, 2010. Under the Senior Notes purchase agreements, the Company is required to make eight annual principal payments of $6.25 million beginning on July 15, 2003. Earlier payments of principal are allowed subject to certain prepayment provisions. Interest is payable semi annually. The principal amount of $50.0 million was used by the Company to repay outstanding borrowings under the 1997 Credit Facility. The holders of the Senior Notes and the lender under the 1998 Credit Facility have a collateral-sharing agreement whereby both sets of creditors have an equal security interest in all the assets of the Company. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 1998, were $49.5 million and related principally to construction of the 560 bed expansion of the Big Spring Complex and the 1,625 bed D. Ray James Prison, and other facility expansions and improvements. The Company is committed to spending an additional $3.5 million through 1999 to complete construction of the D. Ray James Prison. TREASURY STOCK. During the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company repurchased 142,100 shares of common stock on the open market under a share repurchase program at an aggregate cost of $1,646,000. ACQUISITIONS. In January 1998, the Company acquired the Great Plains Correctional Facility. The Company financed the $43.8 million purchase price with a combination of $18.8 million in borrowings under -22- the 1997 Credit Facility and the proceeds from the October 1997 stock offering and cash generated from operations. In August 1998, the Company acquired substantially all of the Alaskan assets of Allvest, a privately held company based in Anchorage, Alaska. The Company financed the $21.3 million purchase price with borrowings under the 1997 Credit Facility. The acquisition included the operations of five pre-release facilities with an aggregate capacity of 540 beds in Anchorage, Fairbanks and Bethel, Alaska, and the real properties of three of the five facilities. In addition, the Company and Allvest agreed to enter into a cooperative venture to jointly pursue the development of a private prison in Delta Junction, Alaska. Management of the Company believes that the cash flows generated from operations, together with the credit available under the 1998 Credit Facility and operating lease capacity thereunder, will provide sufficient liquidity to meet the Company's committed capital and working capital requirements for the near term. It is not anticipated that the 1998 Credit Facility will provide sufficient financing to fund construction costs related to future secure institutional contract awards, expansions or significant future acquisitions. The Company anticipates obtaining additional sources of financing to fund such activities. YEAR 2000 ISSUES The Company continues to identify, evaluate and implement modifications to its business systems in order to achieve Year 2000 date conversion compliance. The Company's business systems are comprised of third-party vendor systems and certain internally developed systems that vary greatly in size, complexity and technical architecture. As a part of the Company's ongoing business plan, the Company continues to install new applications and upgrade existing ones in order to bring applications for its various locations into compliance. The majority of information technology systems readiness efforts and critical-systems testing are scheduled to be completed by the middle of 1999. The remaining systems are to be completed by the fourth quarter of 1999. The Company is in the process of receiving responses from third-party software vendors. Preliminary indications are that they will be Year 2000 ready and will provide updated software on a timely basis. The majority of the non-information technology ("non-IT") systems are scheduled to be inventoried by the second quarter of 1999. All non-IT systems are scheduled to be ready by the end of the third quarter of 1999, with minor exceptions. Normal maintenance schedules for the fourth quarter of 1999 will allow the Company to complete any final readiness efforts. Contacts are currently being made with all critical third parties, such as governmental agencies, financial institutions, suppliers and vendors, to determine if they will be Year 2000 compliant. An aggressive follow-up will be implemented with those third parties not responding or those returning an unacceptable response. If it is determined that there is a significant risk, an effort will be made to work with this third party. If this is not successful, a new provider of the same services will be found. The Company still has not yet determined the complete status of Year 2000 compliance of its third parties or what additional costs, if any, might be required by the Company. The Company is currently implementing a broad information systems upgrade. The estimated costs associated with upgrading hardware and software associated with Year 2000 readiness are approximately $1.8 million and include efforts which were accelerated due to Year 2000 compliance. Total costs incurred as of December 31, 1998, for Year 2000 readiness have not been material. As Year 2000 impact assessment nears completion and the renovation planning, readiness implementation and testing evolve, the estimated costs may change. The most reasonably likely worst-case Year 2000 scenarios would be the inability of third-party suppliers, such as utility providers, telecommunication companies, and other critical suppliers, such as food -23- service suppliers and health care suppliers, to continue providing their products and services or the inability of the Company's contracting governmental agencies to timely pay the Company for its services. These pose the most material operational, safety and/or financial risks to the Company. In addition, the Company may not obtain accurate and timely Year 2000 date impact information from suppliers of automation and process control systems and processes. Without quality information from suppliers, specifically on embedded chip technology, some Year 2000 problems could go undetected until after January 1, 2000. The Company has localized contingency plans already in place and is currently working to develop a corporate-wide contingency plan format. This format includes a template and other guidelines to help develop a plan that will cover the Year 2000 areas of concern. These plans are to be completed and tested, when practicable, by the fourth quarter of 1999. The foregoing Year 2000 discussion includes forward-looking statements of the Company's efforts and management's expectations relating to Year 2000 readiness. The Company's ability to achieve Year 2000 readiness, and the level of costs associated therewith, could be adversely impacted by, among other things, the availability and cost of programming and testing resources, vendors' ability to install or modify proprietary hardware and software, and unanticipated problems identified in the ongoing Year 2000 readiness review. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARD In April 1998, Statement of Position 98-5, Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities ("SOP 98-5") was issued. SOP 98-5 requires entities to expense start-up costs as incurred and to expense previously capitalized start-up costs as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the year adopted. SOP 98-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. At December 31, 1998, the Company's unamortized start-up costs were approximately $4.9 million. In January 1999, the Company adopted SOP 98-5 and recorded a net-of-tax charge of approximately $3.0 million for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. INFLATION Management of the Company believes that inflation has not had a material effect on the Company's results of operations during the past three years. However, most of the Company's facility management contracts provide for payments to the Company of either fixed per diem fees or per diem fees that increase by only small amounts during the terms of the contracts. Inflation could substantially increase the Company's personnel costs (the largest component of facility management expense) or other operating expenses at rates faster than any increases in occupancy fees. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to market risk, primarily from changes in interest rates. The Company continually monitors exposure to market risk and develops appropriate strategies to manage this risk. The Company is not exposed to any other significant market risks, including commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange risk or interest rate risks from the use of derivative financial instruments. Management does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or to speculate on changes in interest rates or commodity prices. - 24 - INTEREST RATE EXPOSURE The Company's exposure to changes in interest rates primarily results from its long-term debt with both fixed and floating interest rates. The Company's debt with fixed interest rates consists of the Senior Notes. The Company's debt with variable interest is its revolving line of credit. At December 31, 1998, approximately 49.2% ($48.4 million) of the long-term debt was subject to variable interest rates. The detrimental effect of a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would be to reduce income before provision for income taxes by approximately $200,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998. At December 31, 1998, the fair value of the Company's fixed rate debt approximated carrying value based upon discounted future cash flows using current market prices. - 25 - REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Board of Directors of Cornell Corrections, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cornell Corrections, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cornell Corrections, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP Houston, Texas February 25, 1999 - 26 - ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
DECEMBER 31, 1998 1997 --------- --------- ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents .............................................. $ 2,519 $ 18,968 Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,141 and $2,644, respectively) .................................. 27,564 20,137 Deferred tax asset ..................................................... 1,209 604 Prepaids and other ..................................................... 2,203 1,366 Restricted assets ...................................................... 2,613 1,564 --------- --------- Total current assets ................................................ 36,108 42,639 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net ............................................... 159,219 52,516 OTHER ASSETS: Intangible assets, net ................................................. 9,935 6,104 Deferred costs and other ............................................... 7,433 2,850 --------- --------- Total assets ........................................................ $ 212,695 $ 104,109 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities ............................... $ 17,838 $ 13,576 Deferred revenues ...................................................... 1,369 2,549 Current portion of long-term debt ...................................... 73 294 --------- --------- Total current liabilities ........................................... 19,280 16,419 LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion .................................... 98,407 138 DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES .................................................. 2,769 58 OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES ............................................... 739 764 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding ..................................................... -- -- Common stock, $.001 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 10,105,916 and 9,945,904 shares issued and outstanding, respectively . 10 10 Additional paid-in capital ............................................. 90,038 89,684 Stock option loans ..................................................... (455) (455) Retained earnings (deficit) ............................................ 5,906 (156) Treasury stock (697,100 and 555,000 shares of common stock, respectively, at cost) ............................................... (3,999) (2,353) Total stockholders' equity .......................................... 91,500 86,730 --------- --------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity .......................... $ 212,695 $ 104,109 ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. - 27 - CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------- 1998 1997 1996 --------- --------- --------- REVENUES ...................................... $ 123,119 $ 70,302 $ 32,327 OPERATING EXPENSES ............................ 98,721 57,047 26,038 DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION ................. 4,228 2,231 1,390 GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ........... 7,581 5,394 4,560 --------- --------- --------- INCOME FROM OPERATIONS ........................ 12,589 5,630 339 INTEREST EXPENSE .............................. 2,601 491 2,810 INTEREST INCOME ............................... (116) (414) (167) --------- --------- --------- INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 10,104 5,553 (2,304) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES .................... 4,042 1,999 75 --------- --------- --------- NET INCOME (LOSS) ............................. $ 6,062 $ 3,554 $ (2,379) ========= ========= ========= NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE: BASIC ...................................... $ .64 $ .48 $ (.65) DILUTED .................................... $ .62 $ .46 $ (.65) NUMBER OF SHARES USED IN PER SHARE COMPUTATION: BASIC ...................................... 9,442 7,350 3,673 DILUTED .................................... 9,772 7,740 3,673
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. - 28 - CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
ADDITIONAL STOCK RETAINED COMMON STOCK PAID-IN OPTION EARNINGS TREASURY SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL LOANS (DEFICIT) STOCK ----------- ------- --------- -------- --------- --------- BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1995............................ 3,189,385 $ 32 $ 6,955 $ -- $ (1,331) $ (2,603) CONVERSION OF PAR VALUE FROM $.01 to $.001.................................... -- (29) 29 -- -- -- ISSUANCES OF COMMON STOCK................................ 3,618,091 3 37,670 -- -- -- EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS.......................................... 512,922 1 1,140 (455) -- -- INCOME TAX BENEFITS FROM STOCK OPTIONS EXERCISED..................................... -- -- 172 -- -- -- STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION................................. -- -- 1,596 -- -- -- REVERSAL OF PUT RIGHT COST............................... -- -- -- -- -- 250 NET LOSS................................................. -- -- -- -- (2,379) -- ----------- ------- --------- -------- --------- --------- BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1996............................ 7,320,398 7 47,562 (455) (3,710) (2,353) ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK................................. 2,250,000 2 41,098 -- -- -- EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTIONS................................ 375,506 1 948 -- -- -- STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION................................. -- -- 76 -- -- -- NET INCOME............................................... -- -- -- -- 3,554 -- ----------- ------- --------- -------- --------- --------- BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1997............................ 9,945,904 $ 10 $ 89,684 $ (455) $ (156) $ (2,353) EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTIONS................................ 160,012 -- 176 -- -- -- INCOME TAX BENEFITS FROM STOCK OPTIONS EXERCISED..................................... -- -- 178 -- -- -- PURCHASE OF TREASURY STOCK (142,100 SHARES, AT COST)............................. -- -- -- -- -- (1,646) NET INCOME............................................... -- -- -- -- 6,062 -- ----------- ------- --------- -------- --------- --------- BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 1998............................ 10,105,916 $ 10 $ 90,038 $ (455) $ 5,906 $ (3,999) ========== ======= ========= ======== ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. - 29 - CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------- 1998 1997 1996 --------- --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss) .................................................. $ 6,062 $ 3,554 $ (2,379) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities -- Depreciation .................................................... 2,880 928 498 Amortization .................................................... 1,348 1,303 892 Deferred income taxes ........................................... 2,106 62 (172) Non-cash stock-based compensation and financing charges ......... -- -- 1,596 Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition of businesses -- Accounts receivable ........................................ (7,427) (4,880) 1,090 Restricted assets .......................................... (1,049) (440) (233) Other assets ............................................... (5,590) (1,291) (1,765) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities ................... 4,249 4,332 (88) Deferred revenues and other liabilities .................... (1,205) 2,051 21 --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ............. 1,374 5,619 (540) --------- --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Capital expenditures ............................................... (49,483) (9,640) (1,256) Acquisition of businesses, less cash acquired ...................... (65,096) (23,621) (25,174) --------- --------- --------- Net cash used in investing activities ........................... (114,579) (33,261) (26,430) --------- --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from long-term debt ....................................... 176,379 29,500 40,841 Payments on long-term debt ......................................... (78,331) (29,813) (47,745) Proceeds from issuance of common stock ............................. -- 41,100 37,673 Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants ............... 354 949 685 Purchases of treasury stock ........................................ (1,646) -- -- --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by financing activities ....................... 96,756 41,736 31,454 --------- --------- --------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS .................. (16,449) 14,094 4,484 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD ...................... 18,968 4,874 390 --------- --------- --------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD ............................ $ 2,519 $ 18,968 $ 4,874 ========= ========= ========= SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE: Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized .......................... $ 765 $ 720 $ 1,454 ========= ========= ========= Income taxes paid .................................................. $ 3,341 $ 1,000 $ 75 ========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. - 30 - CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Cornell Corrections, Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, provides to governmental agencies the integrated development, design, construction and management of facilities within three operating divisions: (i) secure institutional correctional and detention services, (ii) juvenile correctional and detention services and (iii) pre-release correctional services. CONSOLIDATION The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. RESTRICTED ASSETS For certain facilities, the Company maintains bank accounts for restricted cash belonging to offenders or residents, commissary operations, an equipment replacement fund used in state programs and a restoration fund for certain facilities. These bank accounts and commissary inventories are collectively referred to as "restricted assets" in the accompanying financial statements. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Ordinary maintenance and repair costs are expensed, while renewal and betterment costs are capitalized. Prepaid facility use cost, which resulted from the July 1996 acquisition of the Big Spring Complex, is being amortized over 35 years using the straight-line method. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over their estimated useful lives of 30 to 40 years using the straight-line method. Furniture and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 10 years using the straight-line method. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed on the straight-line method based upon the shorter of the life of the asset or the term of the respective lease. CAPITALIZED INTEREST The Company capitalizes interest in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 34, "Capitalization of Interest Costs," on facilities under development and construction. Interest capitalized during 1998 and 1997 was $2,293,000 and $151,000, respectively. INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquired businesses over the fair market value of their net tangible and identified intangible assets. Goodwill is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years, which represents management's estimation of the related benefit to be derived from the acquired business. Under Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 17 and SFAS No. 121, the Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances after the acquisition date indicate that the remaining balance of goodwill may not be recoverable. If factors indicate that goodwill should be evaluated for possible impairment, the Company would compare estimated undiscounted future cash flow from the related operations to the carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill were greater than undiscounted future cash flow, an impairment loss would be recognized. Any impairment loss would be - 31 - CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) computed as the excess of the carrying amount of goodwill over the estimated fair value of the goodwill (calculated based on discounting estimated future cash flows). Accumulated amortization of goodwill was $1,694,000 and $1,279,000 as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. A non-compete agreement was entered into with the President of Abraxas Group, Inc. ("Abraxas") in conjunction with the acquisition of Abraxas in September 1997. The agreement is being amortized over ten years using the straight-line method. Accumulated amortization was $80,000 and $20,000 at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Intangible assets at December 31, 1998 and 1997, were as follows (in thousands): 1998 1997 -------- -------- Goodwill ............... $ 11,109 $ 6,803 Non-compete agreement .. 600 600 -------- -------- 11,709 7,403 Accumulated amortization (1,774) (1,299) -------- -------- $ 9,935 $ 6,104 ======== ======== DEFERRED COSTS Facility start-up costs, which include costs of initial employee training, travel and other direct expenses incurred in connection with the opening of new facilities or initiating new services or programs in existing facilities, are capitalized and generally amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the initial term of the contract plus renewals or five years. Direct incremental development costs paid to unrelated third parties incurred in securing new facilities, including certain costs of responding to requests for proposal ("RFPs"), are capitalized as deferred costs and amortized as part of start-up costs. Internal payroll and other costs incurred in securing new facilities are expensed to general and administrative expenses. Deferred development costs are charged to general and administrative expenses when the success of obtaining a new facility project is considered doubtful. In April 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued SOP 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities," which requires entities to expense start-up costs as incurred and to expense previously capitalized start-up costs as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the year adopted. SOP 98-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. At December 31, 1998, unamortized start-up costs were $4,9